top of page
anchorheader

Pacific Island leaders back joint policing plan




NUKU'ALOFA, Tonga, August 29 ------ Pacific Island leaders endorsed a landmark regional policing plan at a summit in Tonga, a contentious move seen as trying to limit China's security role in the region. 

  

Leaders unveiled a plan to create up to four regional police training centers and a multinational crisis reaction force, backed by $271 million in initial funding from Australia. Under the plan, a corps of about 200 officers drawn from different Pacific Island nations could be dispatched to regional hot spots and disaster zones when needed and invited. 

  

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hailed the plan, saying "this demonstrates how Pacific leaders are working together to shape the future that we want to see." He made the announcement while flanked by leaders of Fiji, Palau, Papua New Guinea and Tonga a symbolic show of unity in a region riven by competition between China and the United States.   

  

Tongan Prime Minister Siaosi Sovaleni, the summit's host, said the initiative would plug regional security gaps and tackle emerging threats like organized crime. "Tonga, like many other countries, is facing a number of transnational security challenges, including seeing an increase in drug trafficking within the Pacific in recent years," he said. 

  

The great game 

Mihai Sora of Sydney-based think tank Lowy Institute said Wednesday's announcement was a diplomatic victory for Australia and for the Pacific Islands Forum, a regional bloc which had appeared deeply divided on the topic. China's Pacific allies — most notably Vanuatu and Solomon Islands — had voiced concern that the plan represented a "geo-strategic denial security doctrine" designed to box out Beijing. While all members of the forum have endorsed the deal in principle, national leaders will have to decide how much they participate, if at all. Sovaleni said Pacific nations would "have the discretion to choose how they would contribute to and benefit." 

  

Partner of choice 

Australia and New Zealand have historically been the region's go-to security partners, leading peacekeeping missions in the Solomon Islands and training in Nauru, Fiji and Papua New Guinea. Policing, however, has increasingly become a cornerstone of Beijing's efforts to build Pacific influence. 

  

China tried and failed to ink a region-wide security pact in 2022, but has since been plying some under-resourced Pacific police forces with martial arts training and fleets of Chinese-made vehicles. Australia and longtime ally the US were caught napping in 2022 when China and the Solomons secretly signed a security pact, the details of which have not been made public. China now maintains a small but conspicuous police presence there, sending a revolving cadre of officers to train locals in shooting and riot tactics. Gleaming new police vehicles roam the capital Honiara emblazoned with the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force badge and stark red "China Aid" stickers. Earlier this year, Beijing also started sending teams of police advisers to Kiribati. There are fears in Washington that China may one day parlay these agreements into a permanent military foothold in the region. 

  

Not yet done 

Sora said Canberra would hope it helps "close the window for China to seek a regional security agreement." Papua New Guinea's Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on Wednesday that his country was keen to "work together with Australia" to implement the proposal. But others signaled lingering misgivings. Top Solomon Islands' diplomatic official Colin Beck told AFP that Honiara would have domestic discussions about the plan before anything is finalized. "We have a national process that we have to dive into it," said Beck, permanent secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. "We are basically reviewing our national security strategy and everything, so it will be part of the conversation," he added. "The matter is still going on. The forum is not yet done." 

  

Source: manilatimes.net  

Comments


bottom of page